Saturday, June 6, 2026

Game of Thrones - we assumed the last 2 seasons were badly written - but were they really?

For years, the final seasons of Game of Thrones have faced intense criticism, primarily centered on a perceived drop in writing quality and a rushed narrative pace. 

The assumption

Much of this backlash stems from a widespread assumption: that the show only began to falter once the showrunners ran out of George R.R. Martin’s source material and had to invent their own ending. 

The reality

However, this narrative overlooks a fundamental truth about television production. The showrunners always controlled the script, successfully shaping the highly acclaimed early seasons by making significant creative choices, cutting dense subplots, and streamlining the narrative long before they outpaced the books.

Reasons for the deviations

To understand why the final seasons took the shape they did, one must look at the massive deviations the show made from the books, and why they were entirely necessary. 
  • Chief among these was the unforgiving "Stark Child" clock. In Martin’s novels, characters like Bran and Arya are young children who can remain frozen in time on the page. In reality, child actors age rapidly.

    If the show had faithfully adapted the incredibly slow, world-building travel arcs of the middle books, the actors would have physically outgrown their roles while their characters were still supposed to be young teenagers. The show simply had to move fast to keep up with human biology

  • Furthermore, a television medium cannot handle the cognitive load of a 1,500-page novel. While a reader can flip back to an index to remember a minor character, a television viewer is watching in real-time, often once a week. Game of Thrones show already had over 300 named characters.

    Adding book-only factions like Lady Stoneheart, the secret Targaryen Prince "Young Griff," or the intricate political webs of Dorne would have turned a global blockbuster into a stressful memory test. Hence, the showrunners were right to merge many characters from the book into a single character many times over, and cutting down a few characters altogether. 

Reasons for the fast paced final 2 seasons

When looking at the fast pacing of the final seasons through this lens, the execution reveals itself not as a failure, but as a masterpiece of structural compression. 
  • By the time the final stretch arrived, the audience was already fully trained; we spent nearly a decade learning the geography, distances, and core vulnerabilities of these characters. Repeating slow travel sequences across Westeros would have been redundant, and skipping them respected the audience's intelligence, trusting the viewers to intuitively bridge the gaps. 

  • This high-speed sprint perfectly matched the frantic urgency of the story itself—the patient game of political chess was over, a literal zombie apocalypse had breached the Wall, and the narrative needed to move with a terrifying momentum. 

  • Most importantly, this pacing delivered the ultimate gift of closure, crossing the finish line as an unforgettable, action-packed cinematic event rather than dragging on and collapsing under its own weight (which I feel the book might be doing. I sincerely wish the final 2 books are released in future but with every passing year, the odds look slim). 

The symmetrical, perfect conclusion

This focused pacing ultimately allowed the story to funnel all its energy into its emotional core, delivering an incredibly rare feat for a narrative of this scale: deeply symmetrical, perfect conclusions for the four surviving Stark children.
🐺 Jon Snow: The Gold in the Fire
Jon Snow emerged as the gold that went through the fire—not destroyed by the intense hardships of his journey but completely refined and purified by them. His return to the true North was not a tragic exile, but a profound homecoming. By returning to the Free Folk—the only people who followed him out of genuine respect rather than superficial titles—Jon shed the heavy, unwanted burdens of the Iron Throne. Surrounded by Tormund, Ghost, and absolute freedom, he finally found the peace he earned.
👑 Sansa Stark: The Queen in the North
Sansa’s arc brought her full circle in a beautiful lesson of appreciation. As a child, she desperately wanted to leave her home, naive to the horrors of the southern courts. It was only by enduring immense hardship in the places she once dreamed of that she truly learned to respect the North as her only safe haven. Her ascension to Queen in the North was the ultimate poetic justice, placing her as the protector of the home she once took for granted.
⛵ Arya Stark: The Untamed Horizon
Arya’s ending perfectly realized her lifelong philosophy of independence, a direct callback to her childhood declaration that the traditional life of a lady was "that's not me" (when her father said her future self would be married off to a lord). Sailing off into the uncharted west to discover what lies beyond the maps was the only conclusion that respected her untamed spirit. Much like her direwolf Nymeria leading a wild pack in the Riverlands, Arya refused to be domesticated by a castle or a marriage, choosing ultimate freedom instead.
👁️ Bran Stark: The Cosmic Chess Master
Bran Stark, as the Three-Eyed Raven, became the perfect fit to unite and rule the remaining kingdoms. Functioning much like Doctor Strange in the Marvel universe, Bran’s greensight allowed him to view thousands of historical and future timelines, calculating every combination to make the absolute best choices for humanity. His ability to see the optimal paths allowed him to calmly grant the North its independence, proving that while Jon and Daenerys were the physical shields and swords of the war, Bran was the ultimate strategist who won the peace.

No comments: